Individualization

Randomness = meaningless, reapeatless, non-pattern..................... what can this character brings to architecture?

Is that a tragedy of architecture ? Or it is a chance? In the project of NOX they always suggested the new design technique, such as computer analog experiment or the others. Those techniques always suugest a new chances for the design process.

So I start to think, what these character of randomness like meaningless, repeatless, non-pattern can give architecture design, the answer is individualization, this is important for architecture design, the structuralism suggested a basic template for certain type of architecture, while post-structuralist suggested the opposite but yet having the same idea in material using or other buidlign technology, but is that possible for people to affort individualized architecture ? But yet afforadable for them to build it up ? Maybe randomness can help here. In this experiment I will start to have the design not for the form of the architecture but use randomness to draw out the basic module of the building form, yes this is the structural system component or we can say this is the frame of the building, and after that we will use this design diagram to adapt different functions of the building or different site. This is like a bit of the factory production process but not yet the same is we are not manufacturing the end product but the basic comoponent.

reference:

Nox OfftheRoad_5Speed project